AI for WisconsinPublic record · operated by Party Party

Official campaign record

Active positions

Positions may come from a decisive representative public-poll proposition, direct candidate action, or a passing member poll. Evidence strength changes the disclosed supporter override threshold; issue importance changes priority only.

activeReview by Feb 21, 2027

Property-tax priority

support

AI for Wisconsin supports this proposition: “Reducing property taxes is more important than increasing public-school spending.”

provisional public mandate

This is a minimal exact translation of the tested proposition. It adds no unpolled conditions, remedies, spending, enforcement details, or legal conclusions.

Position strength
provisional — 1 of 3 resilience
Winning response
58%
Reported margin of error
±6.2 points
Decisive cushion
1.8 points above a majority after uncertainty
Comparable consistency
1 qualifying wave across 1 polling organization
Public priority
Not measured; no salience inference

What would change this position: A binding supporter poll may override this position at 60% of all current ballots, including abstentions. Newer conflicting public evidence can also make the mandate contested.

View exact question, source, methodology, missing voices, and limitations

Request a binding member review

An eligible member may queue a binding review without candidate or operator approval.

activeReview by Feb 21, 2027

ACA marketplace tax credits

support

AI for Wisconsin supports this proposition: “Congress should extend the increased Affordable Care Act marketplace tax credits.”

provisional public mandate

This is a minimal exact translation of the tested proposition. It adds no unpolled conditions, remedies, spending, enforcement details, or legal conclusions.

Position strength
provisional — 1 of 3 resilience
Winning response
64%
Reported margin of error
±4.5 points
Decisive cushion
9.5 points above a majority after uncertainty
Comparable consistency
1 qualifying wave across 1 polling organization
Public priority
Not measured; no salience inference

What would change this position: A binding supporter poll may override this position at 60% of all current ballots, including abstentions. Newer conflicting public evidence can also make the mandate contested.

View exact question, source, methodology, missing voices, and limitations

Request a binding member review

An eligible member may queue a binding review without candidate or operator approval.

activeReview by Feb 21, 2027

Long-term employed immigrants without criminal records

oppose

AI for Wisconsin opposes this proposition: “Deport long-term employed immigrants without criminal records who are living in the United States illegally.”

provisional public mandate

This is a minimal exact translation of the tested proposition. It adds no unpolled conditions, remedies, spending, enforcement details, or legal conclusions.

Position strength
provisional — 1 of 3 resilience
Winning response
64%
Reported margin of error
±6.2 points
Decisive cushion
7.8 points above a majority after uncertainty
Comparable consistency
1 qualifying wave across 1 polling organization
Public priority
Not measured; no salience inference

What would change this position: A binding supporter poll may override this position at 60% of all current ballots, including abstentions. Newer conflicting public evidence can also make the mandate contested.

View exact question, source, methodology, missing voices, and limitations

Request a binding member review

An eligible member may queue a binding review without candidate or operator approval.

activeReview by Feb 21, 2027

Tariffs and Wisconsin farmers

oppose

AI for Wisconsin opposes this proposition: “Tariffs help Wisconsin farmers.”

provisional public mandate

This is a minimal exact translation of the tested proposition. It adds no unpolled conditions, remedies, spending, enforcement details, or legal conclusions.

Position strength
provisional — 1 of 3 resilience
Winning response
67%
Reported margin of error
±6.2 points
Decisive cushion
10.8 points above a majority after uncertainty
Comparable consistency
1 qualifying wave across 1 polling organization
Public priority
Not measured; no salience inference

What would change this position: A binding supporter poll may override this position at 60% of all current ballots, including abstentions. Newer conflicting public evidence can also make the mandate contested.

View exact question, source, methodology, missing voices, and limitations

Request a binding member review

An eligible member may queue a binding review without candidate or operator approval.

activeReview by Feb 21, 2027

Wisconsin surplus package

support

AI for Wisconsin supports this proposition: “The Wisconsin Legislature should have passed the described $1.8 billion surplus package.”

provisional public mandate

This is a minimal exact translation of the tested proposition. It adds no unpolled conditions, remedies, spending, enforcement details, or legal conclusions.

Position strength
provisional — 1 of 3 resilience
Winning response
70%
Reported margin of error
±4.5 points
Decisive cushion
15.5 points above a majority after uncertainty
Comparable consistency
1 qualifying wave across 1 polling organization
Public priority
Not measured; no salience inference

What would change this position: A binding supporter poll may override this position at 60% of all current ballots, including abstentions. Newer conflicting public evidence can also make the mandate contested.

View exact question, source, methodology, missing voices, and limitations

Request a binding member review

An eligible member may queue a binding review without candidate or operator approval.

activeReview by Feb 21, 2027

Tariffs and the U.S. economy

oppose

AI for Wisconsin opposes this proposition: “Tariffs help the United States economy.”

provisional public mandate

This is a minimal exact translation of the tested proposition. It adds no unpolled conditions, remedies, spending, enforcement details, or legal conclusions.

Position strength
provisional — 1 of 3 resilience
Winning response
59%
Reported margin of error
±6.2 points
Decisive cushion
2.8 points above a majority after uncertainty
Comparable consistency
1 qualifying wave across 1 polling organization
Public priority
Not measured; no salience inference

What would change this position: A binding supporter poll may override this position at 60% of all current ballots, including abstentions. Newer conflicting public evidence can also make the mandate contested.

View exact question, source, methodology, missing voices, and limitations

Request a binding member review

An eligible member may queue a binding review without candidate or operator approval.

activeReview by Feb 21, 2027

Local accountability for Wisconsin data centers

support

AI for Wisconsin supports requiring large data-center projects to earn public approval project by project. Developers should publicly demonstrate that local benefits outweigh the full public costs, while affected local and Tribal communities retain enforceable authority over siting and protections for energy, water, infrastructure, housing, taxes, environmental impacts, and emergency services. The campaign opposes blank-check subsidies or approvals without that evidence and accountability.

Approved directly by the accountable candidate. This is not presented as a member or representative Wisconsin result.

Candidate rationale: A Marquette Law School Poll fielded July 8–16, 2026 among 838 Wisconsin registered voters found 76% saying the costs of large data centers outweigh the benefits, 22% saying benefits outweigh costs, and 2% unsure, with an overall reported margin of error of ±4.5 percentage points. That poll measures statewide opinion; it does not establish project-specific facts, legal authority, or the experience of host and Tribal communities. This candidate position therefore applies a precautionary, locally accountable standard rather than treating one poll as a mandate. It is effective for 180 days and may be challenged by any eligible campaign member.

Request a binding member review

An eligible member may queue a binding review without candidate or operator approval.